Diagnosis of acute flank pain: value of unenhanced helical CT. AJR Am. Pfister, S. Unenhanced helical computed tomography versus intravenous urography in patients with acute flank pain: accuracy and economic impact in a randomized prospective trial. Eray, O. The efficacy of urinalysis, plain films, and spiral CT in ED patients with suspected renal colic. Mandal, S. Prospective evaluation of complications using the modified Clavien grading system, and of success rates of percutaneous nephrolithotomy using Guy's stone score: a single-center experience.
Indian J. Sinha, R. Evaluation of stone-free rate using Guy's stone score and assessment of complications using modified Clavien grading system for percutaneous nephro-lithotomy. Urolithiasis 43 , — Vicentini, F. Utility of the Guy's stone score based on computed tomographic scan findings for predicting percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes. Urology 83 , — Sfoungaristos, S.
- Alpine Birdhouse.
- Key points;
- Jurisprudence and Islamic Rulings: Transactions - Part 3 (Islam Questions And Answers Book 24).
- Recommended for you!
- Account Options.
- Metafiction in J.M. Coetzees Foe.
External validation and predictive accuracy assessment of Guy's stone score as a preoperative tool for estimating percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes. Ingimarsson, J. External validation of a preoperative renal stone grading system: reproducibility and inter-rater concordance of the Guy's stone score using preoperative computed tomography and rigorous postoperative stone-free criteria.
Urology 83 , 45—49 Noureldin, Y. External validation of the S. Akhavein, A. Prediction of single procedure success rate using S. Urology 85 , 69—73 Interobserver reliability and reproducibility of S. Matlaga, B. Can the Guy's stone score predict PNL outcomes? External validation of CROES nephrolithometry as a preoperative predictive system for percutaneous nephrolithomy outcomes. Choo, M.
Urological Emergencies: A Practical Guide (Current Clinical Urology) | eBay
External validation and evaluation of reliability and validity of the S-ReSC scoring system to predict stone-free status after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Which is better? Guy's versus S. World J. Kumsar, S. Value of preoperative stone scoring systems in predicting the results of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. European J. Bozkurt, I. Comparison of Guy and Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Nephrolithometry scoring systems for predicting stone-free status and complication rates after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a single center study with cases.
Evaluation and comparison of urolithiasis scoring systems used in percutaneous kidney stone surgery. Tailly, T.
Multi-center external validation and comparison of stone scoring systems in predicting outcomes after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Dhar, M. Imaging in diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of stone patients. Chronic Kidney Dis. Download references. Correspondence to Zeph Okeke. To obtain permission to re-use content from this article visit RightsLink.
BioMed Research International BMC Urology Article metrics. Advanced search. Skip to main content. You are viewing this page in draft mode. Subjects Nomograms Outcomes research Predictive markers Renal calculi. Abstract Percutaneous nephrolithotomy has become the preferred treatment modality for patients with large renal calculi.
Key points The need for standardized outcome reporting following percutaneous nephrolithotomy resulted in the creation of the four major validated scoring systems Guy's stone score, S. Rent or Buy article Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.www.cantinesanpancrazio.it/components/hylygod/1195-rintracciare-posizione.php
The Kelalis--King--Belman Textbook of Clinical Pediatric Urology
References 1. PubMed Article Google Scholar 2. PubMed Article Google Scholar 4. PubMed Article Google Scholar 5. PubMed Article Google Scholar 6. PubMed Article Google Scholar 7. PubMed Article Google Scholar 8. Excessive elaboration of data already given in tables and figures should be avoided. The results obtained from subject analysis such as age and gender distribution are not mentioned in this section. The tense should be in the past form. Discussion: In this section, the data should be interpreted concisely without repeating material already presented in the Results section.
The logical answers to the questions stated in the Introduction section should be proposed.
The content should be limited to new and important information related to the study results. Conclusions: The conclusions or opinions by the author s drawn from the Results and Discussion sections and befitting the purpose s of the study should be described comprehensively, while avoiding a simple summary or redundant information.
Future study direction or expected effects are also best avoided. Conflicts of interest: All authors should disclose any financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately affect the study. Even in cases in which the authors have no conflicts of interest, the authors should declare this as follows: The authors have nothing to disclose. Acknowledgments: The persons or institutes that contributed to the work but were not included as coauthors may be acknowledged.
Any financial or technical support should also be stated. References: References should be numbered serially in the order of appearance in the text, with numbers in brackets [ ].
If referring to more than two sequential references, list all numbers. References should be listed on a separate sheet at the end of the article in the order of citation. List all authors when six or fewer; when seven or more, list six and add "et al. Surname and initials of author s. City: Publisher; Year;Inclusive pages. Kidney stones: medical and surgical management. New York: Lippincott-Raven; ; Title of chapter. In: Surname and initials of editor s. Title of book.
- Community Visioning Programs: Processes and Outcomes (Community Development Research and Practice Series)?
- Hell Gate (Alexandra Cooper Book 12).
- Download Essential Urologic Laparoscopy The Complete Clinical Guide Current Clinical Urology ?
- Current clinical scoring systems of percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes;
- Behind The Veil of Secrets (The Synchronicity Series Book 1);
- Shop by category.
- Physician (Urologist).
Epidemiology, etiology, and prevention of prostate cancer. Campbell-Walsh urology. Philadelphia: Elsevier; ; Title of article. Name of journal Year;Volume:Inclusive pages. In case there is a colon : in the title of the article, the title after the colon should start with a capital letter if it is a full sentence and with a small letter if it is not a sentence. Current status of active surveillance in prostate cancer. Investig Clin Urol ; Salvage radical prostatectomy for recurrent prostate cancer: verification of European Association of Urology guideline criteria.
BJU Int ; Digital illustrations and tables: Should be kept to a necessary minimum and their information should not be duplicated in the text. No more than 10 figures and tables should accompany the manuscript for clinical articles.